Politics

A Leadership and Management

A Leadership and Management

Leadership and Management are the terms that are often considered synonymous. Leadership and Management must go hand in hand.

  • Leadership is setting a new direction or vision for a group that they follow, ie: a leader is the spearhead for that new direction
  • Management controls or directs people/resources in a group according to principles or values that have already been established.

The difference between leadership and management can be illustrated by considering what happens when you have one without the other.

Leadership without management

It sets a direction or vision that others follow, without considering too much how the new direction is going to be achieved. Other people then have to work hard in the trail that is left behind, picking up the pieces and making it work. Eg: in Lord of the Rings, at the council of Elrond, Frodo Baggins rescues the council from conflict by taking responsibility for the quest of destroying the ring – but most of the management of the group comes from others.

Management without leadership

It controls resources to maintain the status quo or ensure things happen according to already-established plans. Eg: a referee manages a sports game, but does not usually provide “leadership” because there is no new change, no new direction – the referee is controlling resources to ensure that the laws of the game are followed and status quo is maintained.

Leadership combined with management

Does both – it both sets a new direction and manages the resources to achieve it. Eg: a newly elected president or prime minister.

The biggest difference between managers and leaders is the way they motivate the people who work or follow them.

Managers have subordinates

By definition, managers have subordinates – unless their title is honorary and given as a mark of seniority

Leaders have followers

Leaders do not have subordinates – at least not when they are leading. Many organizational leaders do have subordinates, but only because they are also managers. But when they want to lead, they have to give up formal authoritarian control, because to lead is to have followers

With the rise of the knowledge worker, “one does not ‘manage’ people,” Mr. Drucker wrote. “The task is to lead people. And the goal is to make productive the specific strengths and knowledge of every individual.”

By: Harikrishna Patel

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply